Bonds from scratch · Chapter 11
Buying a bond makes you a lender, and a lender asks a few plain questions before handing over money. This chapter shows the ratios that answer them, where every company with listed bonds already publishes them, how lending companies differ, 3 real companies side by side, and where the numbers can mislead.
Written 19th Oct 2026 · Figures from SEBI, RBI, ICRA, CRISIL and company filings, dated where used
In November 2021 a reader was looking at a secured bond from a lending company, paying 10.5% a year, sold on a bond app. The rating was fine. The brochure was glossy. And the reader still did not know what to check:
Any bond experts in the house? Can someone give pointers on how to analyse the offer document and the issuing company?
anon75004691, TradingQnA, 28th Nov 2021
The thread has been read more than 15,000 times, and nobody answered that post. Another reader, looking at a different bond, put the puzzle in one line:
if it is secured , and A+ rating ; why do they pay 10% returns ?
HSL, TradingQnA, 20th May 2022
Chapter 10 showed how to read a bond's 2 pieces of paper: the offer document and the rating report. This chapter reads the numbers inside them. When you buy a bond, you are a lender. A bank lending to a company would ask a handful of questions, and each one has a ratio or two that answers it. You can ask the same questions, using numbers the company is already required to publish.
Buying a bond makes you a lender. Ask what a lender asks, and let a few ratios answer.
You do not have to calculate most of these yourself. 3 places hand them to you:
RememberSEBI lists which ratios to publish but not how to calculate them, and rating agencies adjust the numbers their own way. Compare a ratio with the same company's past, or with a similar company using the same source, not across different sources.
The results table, the security cover certificate and the rating report's indicator table carry almost every ratio you need.
Think of lending ₹1 lakh to a neighbour's shop. Before you hand it over, you would want to know 5 things:
Plate 11.1
5 questions, and the ratios that answer them
What to ask before lending to a company, the ratio that answers it, and where to find that ratio
1. Borrowing too much: debt to equity. Debt divided by the owners' own money (net worth). A ratio of 0.8 means the company owes ₹80 for every ₹100 its owners have put in. The higher it goes, the less cushion there is before losses reach the lenders. Rating agencies call this gearing. A cousin, total outside liabilities to net worth, counts everything the company owes, not just loans.
2. Paying the interest: interest coverage. Profit before interest and tax divided by interest. A ratio of 5 means the company earns 5 times its interest bill. Below 2, a bad year can make the interest hard to pay. The debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) goes further: it compares cash earned with interest plus the loan repayments due, because repayments need cash too.
3. Cash on the day: liquidity. For an ordinary company, the current ratio: what it will receive within a year divided by what it must pay within a year. Above 1 is the starting point. For lending companies there are better measures, below.
4. Its own borrowers: bad loans. Only for lenders. A loan counts as a non performing asset (NPA) once a payment is more than 90 days overdue. Gross NPA is bad loans as a share of all loans; net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside to cover them. The share set aside is the provision coverage.
5. What you can claim: security cover. The value of the assets pledged for the bond divided by the bonds they back. SEBI requires listed secured bonds to have at least 100% cover, enough for principal and interest. An unsecured bond has none to claim (chapter 10).
Debt to equity, interest coverage, liquidity, bad loans and security cover answer the 5 questions: how much it owes, whether it can pay the interest, whether it will have cash, whether its own loans are good, and what backs your bond.
Most company bonds sold to retail investors come from lending companies: gold loan lenders, home loan lenders, vehicle and small business lenders. For them, debt is not a warning sign. It is the raw material. A lender borrows money to lend money, so a debt to equity of 3 or 5 is normal, and a reader asking which ratios matter for banks shows how easy it is to use the wrong ones:
Apart from known financial ratios - GP, NP, GPM, NPM, CASA, D/E, D/A are there any banking specific ratios...
Amey1, TradingQnA, 12th Oct 2026
For a lender, 4 numbers matter most, and RBI sets minimums for most of them:
One more thing to watch is refinancing. A reader put it plainly in 2022:
Most of these companies, need to get fresh issue out to redeem the earlier ones. The problem will occur when the fresh issue is not subscribed
neha1101, TradingQnA, 8th Jan 2022
For lenders, look at capital adequacy (at least 15% for most), gross and net bad loans and their trend, liquidity coverage, and short term mismatches. A high debt to equity is normal for a lender.
Here are the published ratios of 3 companies with listed bonds, for the quarter to 30th Jun 2026, taken from their own results filings. They are examples of how to read the numbers, not views on the bonds.
| Ratio | Bajaj Finance (lender, AAA) | Kosamattam Finance (gold lender, A) | Torrent Power (power company, AA+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net worth | ₹1,08,862 crore | ₹1,338 crore | Not needed here |
| Debt to equity | 3.20 | 5.63 | 0.78 |
| Capital adequacy | 20.90% | 20.96% | Not a lender |
| Gross / net NPA | 1.20% / 0.49% | 1.23% / 0.55% | Not a lender |
| Liquidity coverage | 231% | 310% | Current ratio 1.53 |
| Interest / debt service cover | "Not relevant" for a lender | Not given | 5.84 / 3.89 |
| Security cover | Per bond, in its certificate | 1.22 times, shared with banks | 2.07 to 2.39 times |
Plate 11.2
3 companies, same quarter
Quarter to 30th Jun 2026. The 2 lenders look alike on the ratios; their size does not
The 2 lenders look almost the same. Both hold about 21% capital against a 15% minimum, both report bad loans near 1.2%, and both have far more liquidity than RBI asks for. Yet Bajaj Finance's 10 year secured bond issued in July 2026 carries a 7.79% coupon, while Kosamattam's public issue in August 2026 offered about 8.3% to 10.5%, according to issue summaries. The ratios do not explain the gap. What does is everything the ratios leave out: Bajaj Finance's owners have put in about 80 times as much money, it lends across India and across many kinds of loans, and it can borrow from banks and markets easily. A small, regional lender pays more because if things go wrong, it has fewer places to turn. That is the answer to HSL's question: the extra yield pays for size, spread and access to money, not for anything a single ratio shows.
Trends beat snapshots. Kosamattam's cost of bad loans rose to ₹10.4 crore in the quarter, from ₹1.1 crore a year earlier. One quarter is not a trend, but it is the kind of number worth checking again next quarter.
Read the cover certificate, not just the number. Kosamattam's secured bonds have cover of 1.22 times, against the 1.10 times it promised. But the same assets also back about ₹2,964 crore of bank loans, which share them equally with the bonds. Its subordinated debt and unsecured bonds are marked "NA": no cover at all.
The same bond can show 2 covers. Torrent Power's trustee certified cover of 5.18 times for the quarter to 30th Sep 2025, valuing its power plants at market value. Torrent's own results for the same date showed 2.33 times. Both can be right; they value the assets differently. Always check which value a cover figure uses, and note that the valuation behind it is only required once in 3 years.
Ratios move with decisions. Torrent's debt to equity rose from 0.57 in March 2026 to 0.78 in June, after it raised ₹3,800 crore of bonds and bought another power company. CRISIL said a sustained rise in its debt to earnings above 3.5 to 4 times could cut its rating. When a company makes a big purchase, expect its ratios to move, and read the rating report to see where the agency draws the line.
Similar ratios do not mean similar risk: size, spread and access to funding explain much of the extra yield. Watch the trend, read the cover certificate in full, and check how assets are valued.
Rating agencies do not publish a pass mark, but ICRA publishes the ranges it treats as relatively strong and relatively weak for companies outside finance. For construction companies, for example:
| Ratio | Relatively strong | Relatively weak |
|---|---|---|
| Total outside liabilities to net worth | 0.9 times or less | 3 times or more |
| Debt to operating profit | 0.5 times or less | 5 times or more |
| Interest coverage | 18 times or more | Below 2 times |
| Debt service coverage | 4 times or more | Below 1.1 times |
For lenders' bad loans, ICRA treats loans more than 90 days overdue, including those written off in the past year, of under 2% as strong for retail lenders and over 6.9% as weak; for housing finance companies, under 1.5% and over 5.5%.
Use agency ranges as a rough map, not a pass mark: interest cover below 2, debt service cover near 1, or debt above 5 times profit are signs to read the rating report closely.
On 16th Aug 2018, ICRA described IL&FS's numbers as of 31st Mar 2018. Its borrowing was 3.04 times its net worth, or 2.30 times on the regulator's own measure, against a legal limit of 2.5 times. It reported "nil gross and net NPAs". Its return on net worth was about 11%. Within weeks it began missing payments, and by September 2018 its bonds were rated D (chapter 13's case files tell the rest).
The ratios were not lying. They described the year that had ended. What they did not show was that ₹9,000 crore of money owed to it was stuck in delayed claims, that it had promised to repay the debts of its group companies, and that it was waiting on fresh money from its shareholders to meet what it owed. Those were in the rating report's words, not in its table of numbers.
A clean ratio table is a picture of last year. Read the words around it: delayed payments, guarantees for group companies, and how soon the debt falls due.
Ratios look backward, follow no single formula, can be flattered by write offs and old valuations, and rest on accounts nobody has re-audited for you. Use them to ask better questions, not to end the thinking.
To anon75004691: start with the 5 questions in section 3. For a lending company, the capital ratio, bad loans, liquidity and security cover answer most of them, and every listed lender must publish them each quarter. Then read why the rating is what it is.
To HSL: a secured A rated lender pays 10% because it is small, regional and has fewer ways to raise money than an AAA lender, even when its ratios look similar. The extra yield pays you for that; whether it is enough is your call.
Results table, then the lender or company ratios, then the trend, the cover certificate, the rating report, a peer, and finally what the numbers cannot show.
| Figure | How often it changes | Where to find it |
|---|---|---|
| A company's published ratios | Every quarter | Its financial results on NSE or BSE |
| Security cover | Every quarter | The security cover certificate in its exchange filings |
| The rating agency's view of the ratios | At least once a year | The rating rationale on the agency's website |
| RBI's minimums for lenders | When RBI changes them | RBI's Directions for non banking financial companies and banks |
| The list of ratios companies must publish | When SEBI changes it | SEBI's listing regulations, regulation 52(4) |
| What agencies count as strong or weak | Every few years | Each agency's published rating methodologies |